FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlistRegisterRegister  ProfileProfile   Log in[ Log in ]  Flint Talk RSSFlint Talk RSS

»Home »Open Chat »Political Talk  Â»Flint Journal »Political Jokes »The Bob Leonard Show  

Flint Michigan online news magazine. We have lively web forums


FlintTalk.com Forum Index > Political Talk

Topic: The Liberals' Creed

  Author    Post Post new topic Reply to topic
Steve Myers
Site Admin
Site Admin

The Liberals' Creed

Editorial
May 27, 2004

by: Robert Alt




Kirkuk, Iraq: For all the talk about a widening religiosity gap
between the right and the left, sentiment from the left indicates a
certain religious fervor about the war in Iraq. A string of recent
letters and articles from those of a more liberal persuasion suggest
that they choose to ignore or simply do not believe information which
is inconsistent with their basic tenets. Theirs is a policy of faith,
and here is their creed.

We believe in the United Nations, and Kofi Annan, the maker of
international legitimacy.

We believe that the UN inspections worked.
We believe that SCUD missiles fired at U.S. troops minutes after the
war began don't change anything;
We believe that 3 liters of sarin gas used against U.S. troops doesn't
change anything;
We believe that finding evidence of mustard gas doesn't change
anything.

We believe that the war in Iraq conducted by a Republican president
was unjustified because it lacked UN approval;
We believe that the "military action" in Kosovo conducted by a
Democratic president was justified without UN approval.

We believe that the Iraq war was unilateral.
We believe that the participation of Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan,
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador,
Estonia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, South
Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,
Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, and Ukraine does not change the fact
that the war was unilateral;
We believe that multilateralism can only be achieved with the
participation of France and Germany;
We believe in multilateralism.

We believe that this war was motivated by greed and oil;
We believe that when France, Germany, and Russia opposed the war, they
were motivated by principle, and not by sweetheart oil deals or
Oil-For-Food kickbacks;
We believe that US oil prices are too high, and that the
administration failed in its responsibility to do something about it.

We believe that the U.S. may only legitimately use force for
humanitarian ends in one place if it does so in all places where aid
might be needed;
We believe that the U.S. may not quell threats in places where the
cost is relatively low unless it is willing to use force in places
like North Korea, where the cost in lives would likely be very high;
We believe that a humanitarian action is only truly humanitarian if
there are no strategic interests to muddle the altruism.

We believe that President Bush lied.
We believe that Prime Minister Blair lied.
We believe that when Hillary Clinton and Dick Gephardt voted for the
war based on the same intelligence relied upon by Bush and Blair, they
made reasonable decisions based on the intelligence available at the
time.

We believe that the administration did not make the case for war;
We believe that the administration offered many different reasons but
could not offer a coherent message explaining the need to go to war;
We believe that the administration made perfectly clear that the only
reason we were going to war was because of the threat from WMDs.

We believe that there were no WMDs.
We believe that finding sarin gas is 14th page news;
We believe that if the sarin gas is old, then it really isn't a WMD we
were looking for;
We believe that it wasn't really sarin gas;
We believe that sarin gas isn't necessarily a WMD.

We believe that there was no terrorist connection to, or threat from,
Iraq.
We believe that members of Abu Nidal in Iraq would not have committed
terrorist acts if we had not invaded;
We believe that al Qaeda operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi would not have
committed terrorist acts if we had not invaded;
We believe that Saddam's terrorist training camp at Salman
Pak-complete with a Boeing 707 plane used for hijacking drills-did not
exist or posed no real threat;
We believe that it was merely a coincidence that the pharmaceutical
factory bombed by President Clinton in Sudan was using al Qaeda funds
and a uniquely Iraqi formula to produce VX gas;
We believe that we are responsible for bringing terror on ourselves.

We believe that the prisoner abuse in Abu Ghraib is widespread and is
probably the tip of the iceberg;
We believe that Abu Ghraib proves that the America's occupation is no
different than Saddam's tyranny;
We believe that any attempt to suggest that there is a moral
difference between a regime which systematically killed 300,000 people
and tortured countless others and a regime which punished the acts of
Abu Ghraib is illegitimate.

We believe that soldiers deliberately target women and children;
We believe that the soldiers abuse and kill Iraqis because they are
racists;
We support our troops.

We believe that no one should question our statement that we "support
our troops;"
We believe that the best thing that could happen for this country
would be for Bush to lose in November;
We believe that the best way for Bush to lose in November is for the
Iraq effort to go poorly, even if that means that more Iraqis and
troops will die;
We believe that most of the troops are minorities and the poor;
We believe that when the word "heroes" is used to describe our troops,
it should always be enclosed in scare quotes.

We believe in quagmire.
We believe that when fringe Iraqi groups attack hard targets and are
soundly defeated with relatively low Coalition casualties, that this
is inescapable evidence of crisis;
We believe that Iraq is Bush's Vietnam.

We believe that Vietnam is the lens through which all wars should be
viewed.
We believe that soldiers in Vietnam were baby killers;
We believe that John Kerry is a hero for his service in Vietnam.

We believe that because John Kerry is a hero, he necessarily has the
national security expertise necessary to be commander-in-chief.
We believe that any attempt to question his national security
expertise based on his voting record, including his decision to vote
against a supplemental bill used to buy the soldiers body armor, is an
unfair attack on the patriotism of a hero, who by virtue of this
honorific has the expertise to be commander-in-chief.

We believe in the trinity: NPR, CNN, and the New York Times. We
believe in Ted Kennedy, Tom Harkin, John Kerry, and all the DNC, and
we look for President Clinton yet to come. Amen.

(Robert D. Alt is a Fellow in Legal and International Affairs at The
John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University
currently reporting from Iraq. You can follow his daily progress at No
Left Turns. )



http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/alt/04/creed.html
Post Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:54 am 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger  Reply with quote  
  Display posts from previous:      
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


Last Topic | Next Topic  >

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Flint Michigan online news magazine. We have lively web forums

Website Copyright © 2010 Flint Talk.com
Contact Webmaster - FlintTalk.com >